Effect of Working Capital Management on Financial Performance of Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies in Sheema Municipality, Uganda
Natukunda Neema, Andrew Nyakundi, Tom Mulegi, Manyange Michael and David Nyambane
Kampala International University, Uganda
ABSTRACT
This study examines the impact of working capital management on the financial performance of Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies (SACCOs) in Sheema Municipality, Uganda. SACCOs play a vital role in Uganda’s economic development, contributing to the country’s GDP and providing financial services to a significant portion of the population. However, SACCOs have faced challenges in managing their working capital, particularly in cash management, accounts receivable management, and accounts payable management. The study employed a descriptive research design with a sample size of 106 respondents. The data was collected using questionnaires, and the study used multiple regression analysis to analyze the data. The findings indicated that cash management and accounts payable management had an insignificant effect on financial performance, while accounts receivable management had a significant effect. The study recommends the implementation of automated systems, effective internal controls, and staff training to improve SACCOs’ working capital management. The research is valuable for government policymakers, scholars, and SACCO management teams.
Keywords: Accounts receivable management, Cash management, Account payable management, Financial performance.
INTRODUCTION
Working capital is the difference between current assets and current liabilities [1, 2]. A company’s working capital is made up of three main elements: receivable, payable and cash management [3, 4]. Therefore, strategies are developed on the basis of the three to assist the business to collect debt and make payments for credit [5, 6]. The managing of debtors is the duration taken for clients to settle their accounts after getting goods and services. It shows the average total of times taken for a corporation to obtain payouts by clients [6]. Accounts receivables are affected by the company’s credit gathering policies in terms of how frequently they are turned into cash. Profitability issue may rise when a company policy favor giving clients a longer grace period, but at the price of liquidity [7]. Worldwide, credit and savings Cooperative Societies (SACCOs), help in the provision of affordable credit facilities. SACCOs create job opportunities and contribute immensely towards GDP through payment of taxes such as employment taxes, property taxes, and sales taxes (U.S. Department of SACCOs, 2017). Globally, about 280 million individuals are involved in SACCOS representing 10% [8]. Study conducted in 2016 by European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprise (EURICSE) and International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) shows that 33% of SACCOs globally provide financial services in different countries [9]. Governments have also purchased shares in SACCOs, for instance in 2015, Netherlands, Italy, and Finland each had 83%, 55%, and 31% had purchased shares respectively in SACCOs [8, 10]. In Europe, there are more than 13.8 million members, with more than 58,000 SACCOs and in UK there are more than 72,000 Savings and Credit Cooperative Organizations, with at least 140 million members who generate one billion UK dollars a year.
Most of SACCOs are founded in the areas of Pharmaceuticals and Health Care industry. Due to their roles in economic development of nations, United Nations had to declare 2012 as an International Year of SACCOs to disseminate information on the contribution they make to economic development throughout the world. The situation in the organization of SACCOs has drastically changed due to expanding effects of globalization, competition in the market, technological advancements and challenges in working capital management [10, 11, 12]. Working capital management has been singled out as a challenge in SACCOs. [13], indicates a decrease in SACCOs by 25% which started in 2005 due to working capital challenges. In Africa, SACCOs are the source of income to about 80% people, either directly or indirectly. It’s estimated that 24.6 million people which is approximately 63% are engaged in SACCO institutions either directly or indirectly. The majority of governments have started a widespread campaign to coordinate cooperative activities through establishment of relevant laws, however poor financial performance has remained as a major challenge [14]. In East Africa, Sacco Societies play a significant role by offering deposit and non-deposit-taking services [15]. Due to poor financial performance some countries like Kenya have developed legal framework restricting credit facilities to customers [15]. Notably SACCOs in Kenya are the biggest in Africa and have had phenomenal development, accounting for over 60%, of savings, loans, and assets [16]. In Uganda, SACCOs are classified as Tier 4 financial institutions by the Bank of Uganda (BoU). The BoU does not undertake prudential oversight over Tier 4 Institutions, and they are also prohibited from mobilizing public deposits. SACCOs are governed by the Uganda Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies Act 1992, which also mandates the Ministry of Trade, Tourism, and Industry (MTTI) to keep a register of all savings and credit cooperative societies and monitor their smooth operation and stability [17]. According to [18], non-performing loans grew from Ugx13.21 billion in 2015 to Ugx15.57 billion in 2016 which portrays a worrying trend. SACCOs due to their vital role in economic development are the key beneficiaries of government’s financial support [19]. Customers prefer SACCOs over other financial institutions, because of proximity [20]. However, fraudulent activities have also grown [21]. Due to poor financial performance as result of failure to effectively manage credit risks, over 26% of the loans made to consumers remained unpaid, and more than 60% of the SACCOs founded are unable to mark their next birthday [22]. Therefore, financial challenge is evident in SACCOs when dealing with liquidity and loan portfolio management [23]. Despite overall increase in enrollment of membership and dynamic engagement of 15.6% in 2016 and 17.5%, in 2017, fewer SACCOs were evidently in operation and situation seems to have downward spiral effect [18].
Problem statement
The role of SACCOs is huge in economic development of a nation. They improve economic status of their members through provision of affordable credit facility. Globally, SACCOs create 10% employment opportunities [8]. These organizations offer both deposit and non-deposit services to the customers [15]. Most of SACCOs in Uganda are struggling to survive others have closed shop due to poor financial performance. The reports available shows that loans given out in 2019, over 26% were not recovered and 60% of launched SACCOs often fail or die within a period of one year. The SACCOs administratively are under the Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Industry [17]. Despite efforts made by the Government and Non-Governmental organizations in providing financial support, the issue of low financial performances has persisted. Therefore, the issues of concern were unknown effects of accounts receivable management, accounts payable management and cash management. If the situation is not addressed, majority of SACCOs will collapse thereby affecting the economy and create unemployment crisis among other foreseeable consequences. Therefore, there was need to study the effect of working capital on financial performance of SACCOs in Sheema Municipality in Uganda.
Research hypotheses
Ho1: There is no significant effect of cash management on financial performance of SACCOs in Sheema Municipality.
Ho2: There is no significant effect of accounts receivables management on financial Performance of Sacco’s in Sheema Municipality
Ho3: There is no significant effect on accounts payable management on financial
performance of Sacco’s in Sheema Municipality.
Theoretical framework
The study was anchored on Working Capital Management Theory [24]. According to this theory, businesses are expected to finance working capital, monitor factors that affect working capital, manage cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and the cash conversion cycle, as well as measure and analyze performance to ensure that long-term assets are used effectively and efficiently. The components of the theory were accounts payable, cash management and account receivables which formed the constructs of the study and therefore the theory was relevance to guide the study.
Conceptual framework
Working capital Financial performance of SACCOs
Source. Researcher, 2023
|
LITERATURE REVIEW
Cash management and financial performance of SACCOs
[25] in their study reported that effective cash management practices have an impact on the financial performance of SMEs. [26] also through their research recommended the use of effective cash management practices to improve financial performance of organizations. [27] reported that cash management had both adverse and minor impact on financial performance. [28] in his study shows how financial plans and cash flows can describe the consequence of every unwavering venture. According to [29], effective managing of cash increases business’s flexibility and offer viable competitive advantage. Similar findings were made by [30] who found that decent managing of cash permits a company to benefit from discounts.
Accounts receivable management and financial performance of SACCOs
[31, 32] in their study reported that debt has impact on a company’s financial performance. Further, [33] reported that corporate debt negatively affects firm’s financial performance. [34] using his result of the study recommended that there is need to establish clear policies and procedures for extending credit to individuals and collecting individual accounts to enhance effective credit management. Credit management is described as the set of practices and policies used by a company to maintain total credit and manage it well [35].
Accounts payable management and financial performance of SACCOs
[36] in their study showed that accounts payable has a positive relationship with financial performance of manufacturing organizations. [37] in their research found that accounts payable has a positive and statistically significant relationship with financial performance. Further, [38], reported that accounts payable management affects financial performance of organizations. [39] assessed the influence of Accounts payable management (APM) practices on financial performance (FP) of Hotels in Nyeri County, Kenya. The study revealed that APM practices had positive and statistically insignificant effect on FP of Hotels. [40] conducted a study to evaluate the effect of account payables on financial performance of Private Medical Facilities in Mombasa County, Kenya. The findings indicated an adverse correlation between accounts payable and financial performance. Similar study by [41] in Pakistan showed that APM had an impact on financial performance of firms.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
A descriptive research design was adopted in conducting the study and quantitative research approach was used [42]. Study population was 145 and a sample of 106 respondents. Simple random sampling method was used to select respondents for the study. Data was collected by use of questionnaire. Both content validity and reliability of the research instrument were undertaken. The data was analyzed using multiple regression technique with the help of statistical package for social science (SPSS version 29). The regression model was developed as shown below.
Y = B0 + B1X1 + B2X2 +B3X3 + e
Where:
Y = Financial performance of SACCOs X1 = Cash management
X2 = Accounts receivable management X3 = Accounts payable management
Bs = Coefficients of independent variables e = Error term (5%)
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Effect of Cash management on financial performance of SACCO
The Likert scale was used to rank rating of respondents. The key for Likert scale: SA – Strongly Agree (5), A – Agree (4), N – Neutral (3), DA – Disagree (2), SDA – Strongly disagree (1)
The result of cash management and financial performance is shown in table1 below.
Statements | SA | A | N | DA | SDA | Mean | SD | |
Management of Cash Conversion Cycle is important for increasing the company’sProfitability | N% | 6769.8 | 2728.1 | 00.0 | 11.0 | 11 | 4.65 | .649 |
The SACCO frequently prepares cash budget | N% | 6264.6 | 3031.3 | 33.1 | 0.0.0 | 11 | 4.58 | .660 |
Cash at the SACCO is normally kept in protectedArea | N% | 6971.9 | 2222.9 | 44.2 | 11.0 | 00 | 4.66 | .613 |
There is good coordination between our SACCO and commercial banks in managing cash | N% | 7072.9 | 2121.9 | 33.1 | 22.1 | 00 | 4.66 | .646 |
The SACCO uses computerized system to manage cash | N% | 7072.9 | 2222.9 | 33.1 | 11.0 | 00 | 4.68 | .589 |
Only authorized persons are the ones accessingcash at the SACCO. | N% | 7578.1 | 1717.5 | 33.1 | 11.0 | 00. | 4.73 | .571 |
Table 1. Cash management and financial performance
Source: Field data, 2023
Total of 67 (69.8%) strongly agreed, 27 (28.1%) agreed, 1 (1.0%) disagreed, 1 (1.0) strongly disagreed. On preparation of cash budget, 62 (64.6%) strongly agreed, 30 (31.3%) agreed, 3 (3.1%), were neutral. Keeping of cash in protected area, a total of 69 (71.9%) strongly agreed, 22 (22.9%) agreed, 4(4.2%), were neutral 1 (1.0%). For good coordination between SACCOs and commercial banks in managing cash, 70 (72.9%) strongly agreed, 21 (21.9%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral, 2(2.1%). Computerization system to manage cash, 70 (72.9%) strongly agreed, 22 (22.9%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral, 1(1.0%), disagreed. On personnel authorization to access cash at SACCOs, 75 (78.1%) strongly agreed, 17 (17.5%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral, 1(1.0%). The overall mean was 4.66 and standard deviation of 0.621, implying that all respondents were in agreement with all questions raised on cash management in SACCOs.
Accounts receivable management and financial performance
Results are shown in table 2 below
Table 2. Accounts receivable management and financial performance of SACCOs
Statements | SA | A | N | DA | SDA | Mean | SD | |
Management of receivables is important forincreasing the company’s profitability | N% | 6163.5 | 3435.4 | 11.0 | 00 | 00 | 4.63 | .508 |
There is enough staff in the SACCO to handleReceivables | N% | 5355.2 | 3838.6 | 44.2 | 11 | 00 | 4.49 | .632 |
The manager normally supervises the receivablesof the SACCO | N% | 5557.3 | 3839.6 | 33.1 | 00 | 00 | 4.54 | .560 |
SACCO uses computerized system to manageReceivables | N% | 5961.5 | 3435.4 | 33.1 | 00 | 00 | 4.58 | .556 |
The SACCO normally carries out receivables review | N% | 5557.3 | 3435.4 | 77.3 | 00 | 00 | 4.50 | .632 |
Only authorize personnel are allowed to access the payables information at the SACCO | N% | 5355.2 | 3637.5 | 44.2 | 33.1 | 00 | 4.45 | .724 |
Source Field data, 2023
On significance of managing account receivables, results showed that 61 (63.5%) strongly agreed, 34 (35.4%) agreed, 1(1.0%) was neutral. For enough staff in the SACCOs to manage account receivables, 53 (55.2%) strongly agreed, 38 (38.6%) agreed, 4(4.2%) were neutral, 1(1.0%) disagreed. As for the statement that managers normally supervise the receivables of the SACCO, 55 (57.3%) strongly agreed, 38 (38.6%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral. On utilization of computerized system to manage receivables, result showed that59 (61.5%) strongly agreed, 34 (35.4%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral. For receivables review, results showed that 55 (57.3%) strongly agreed, 34 (35.4%) agreed, 7(37.3%) were neutral. For personnel authorization to access receivables information at the SACCO, 53 (55.2%) strongly agreed, 36 (37.5%) agreed, 4(4.2%) were neutral, 3(3.1%) disagreed. The overall mean and standard deviation were 4.53 and 0.602 respectively.
Accounts payables management on financial performance of SACCOs
Findings are recorded in table 3 below.
Table 3: Accounts payables management and financial performance of SACCOs
Statement | SA | A | N | DA | SDA | Mean | SD | |
Management of payables is important forincreasing the company’s profitability | N% | 5456.3 | 3940.6 | 33.1 | 00. | 00 | 4.53 | .561 |
There is enough staff in the SACCO tohandle payables | N% | 5254.2 | 3940.6 | 55.2 | 00 | 00 | 4.49 | .598 |
The manager normally supervises thepayables of the SACCO | N% | 5557.3 | 3839.6 | 33.1 | 00 | 00 | 4.54 | .560 |
The SACCO uses computerized system tomanage payables | N% | 6365.6 | 3031.3 | 33.1 | 00 | 00 | 4.62 | .548 |
The SACCO normally carries out payablesreview | N% | 4647.9 | 4647.9 | 44.2 | 00 | 00 | 4.44 | .577 |
Only authorized personnel are allowed to access the payables information at the SACCO | N% | 5860.4 | 3536.5 | 22.1 | 11 | 00 | 4.56 | .595 |
Source. Field data, 2023
Importance of managing payables to increase profitability, 54 (56.3%) strongly agreed, 39 (40.6%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral. For enough staff to handle payable, 52 (54.2%) strongly agreed, 39 (40.6%) agreed, 5(5.2%) were neutral. Supervision of payables by manager, result showed that 55 (57.3%) strongly agreed, 38 (39.6%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral. On utilization of computerized systems to manage payables, 63(65.6%) strongly agreed, 30 (31.3%) agreed, 3(3.1%) were neutral. For payable review, result showed that 46 (47.9%) strongly agreed, 46 (47.9%) agreed, 4(4.2%) were neutral. For personnel authorized to access payables information 58 (60.4%) strongly agreed, 35 (36.5%) agreed, 2(2.1%) were neutral, 1(1.0%) disagreed. The overall mean and standard deviation were 4.53 and 0.573 respectively
Results on hypotheses
Regression analysis results are shown in table 4a,b,c
Table4a. Model Summary
Model | R | R2 | Adjusted R2 | Std. Error of the Estimate |
1 | .762a | .580 | .566 | .22081 |
a. Predictors: (Constant), Accounts payable management (APM), Cash management (CM) Accounts receivable management (ARM) |
The model summary is a measure of the quality of prediction of the financial performance of SACCOs. A value of 0.762 (R=.762) indicates a good level of prediction. The working capital management can explain 58 % (R2=.58) of the variability in financial performance in SACCOs while 42 % can be explained by other factors not covered in this regression model.
Table 4b. Analysis of variance (ANOVAa)
Model | SS | DF | MS | F | Sig. | |
Regression | 6.198 | 2 | 3.049 | 64.6 | .000b | |
1 | Residual | 4.486 | 93 | .0.048 | ||
Total | 10.684 | 95 | ||||
a. Dependent Variable: Financial Performance | ||||||
b. Predictors: (Constant), Accounts payable management (APM), Cashmanagement (CM) Accounts receivable management (ARM) |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests whether the overall regression model is good fit for the data. Table 4b above shows that the independent variables statistically significantly predict the dependent variable, {F.05 (2, 93) = 64.6, p<.05}. Therefore, regression model was a good fit of the data
Table 4c: Coefficientsa
Model | UnstandardizedCoefficients | StandardizedCoefficients | t | Sig. | ||
B | Std. Error | Beta | ||||
(Constant) | 1.682 | .326 | 5.152 | .000 | ||
1 | CM | -.006 | .064 | -.007 | -.098 | .922 |
ARM | .494 | .085 | .619 | 5.808 | .000 | |
APM | .160 | .089 | .182 | 1.793 | .076 | |
a. Dependent Variable: Financial performance (FP) |
The general model equation to predict financial performance of SACCOs from cash management, account receivables management and accounts payable management is shown below:
Y= 1.682 – .006 X1 + .494 X2 + .160 X3———————————————————————————————— 1
Ho1: Cash management has no effect on financial performance of SACCOs
Results indicated a statistically insignificant effect of cash management (CM) on financial performance (t= -.098, P=.922, P>.05). Therefore, the study accepted null hypothesis. The coefficient implies that an increase in one unit of cash management can decrease the financial performance of SACCOs by.006 units.
Ho2: Accounts receivables management has no effect on financial performance of SACCOs Results showed that accounts receivables management (ARM) was statistically significant (t=5.808, P=.000, P<.05). Therefore, null hypothesis was rejected. The coefficient of ARM implies that an increase of one unit ARM can increase financial performance of SACCOs by.494 units.
Ho3: Accounts payable management has no effect on financial performance of SACCOs
Results revealed that APM was statistically insignificant (t=1.793, P=.076, P>.05). Therefore, the study accepted null hypothesis. Coefficient recorded implies that although APM is statistically insignificant can affect financial performance of SACCOs positively by.160 units.
DISCUSSION
Cash management and financial performance of SACCOs
Result indicated a statistically insignificant effect of cash management (CM) on financial performance. The findings contradict the report of [25] who reported that effective cash management practices have an impact on the financial performance of SMEs. It also disagrees with [26] who recommended effective cash management to improve financial performance of organizations. However, the findings are in agreement with the study of [27] who reported that cash management had adverse and minor impact on financial performance.
Accounts receivables management and financial performance of SACCOs
Results showed that accounts receivables management was statistically significant. Result is in agreement with the reports of [31, 32] who indicated that debt has impact on a company’s financial performance. Further, the results support [33] who reported that corporate debt negatively affects firm’s financial performance.
Accounts payables management and financial performance of SACCOs
The findings revealed that accounts Payable management was statistically insignificant. The finding disagrees with the report of [36] who indicated that accounts payable has a positive relationship with financial performance of manufacturing organizations. It further varies from the findings of [37-42] who reported that accounts payable has a positive and statistically significant relationship with financial performance. Also, the outcome is further in disagreement with [38], who reported that accounts payable management affects financial performance.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this study has shed light on the crucial role of working capital management in the financial performance of SACCOs in Sheema Municipality, Uganda. The findings highlight that accounts receivable management significantly affects financial performance, while cash management and accounts payable management have insignificant effects. This implies that SACCOs should pay more attention to improving their accounts receivable management practices to enhance their financial performance.
RECOMMENDATIONS
To address the challenges faced by SACCOs, the study recommends the adoption of automated systems, the implementation of effective internal controls, and regular staff training. The research’s significance extends to government policymakers, scholars, and SACCO management teams, providing insights into strategies to enhance the financial performance of these important financial institutions.
REFERENCES
- Nurein, (2014). Effect of Working Capital Management and Financial Constraints on Corporate Performance, a Thesis Submitted to Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, In Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Master of Science in Finance.
- Finau, F. 2011. Impact of Working Capital Management Dynamics on Performance of Tongan Enterprises in New Zealand: UNITEC Institute of Technology
- Arnold, (2008). Corporate financial management. Pearson education limited, 4th edition,
- Gitman, L. (2009). Principles of Managerial finance, Boston, MA: Pearson Prentice Hall. Hanken School of Economics.
- Block, B. S., & Hirt, G.A. (1992). Foundation of Financial Management, (6 th ed.).USA.
- Lantz, (2008). Efficiency of Working Capital Management and Corporate Profitability, Journal Financial Practice and Education.
- Erik, R (2012). Effects of Working Capital Management and Company Profitability: An Industry-wise study of Finish and Swedish Public Companies, a Thesis Submitted to the Department of Accounting, Hankin School of Economics, Helsinki.
- European Parliament, (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the council of 27 November on European business statistics, repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/2152/oj
- ICA (International Cooperative Alliance) and EURICSE (European Research Institute on Cooperative and Social Enterprises) (2018), “Exploring the cooperative economy”, World Cooperative Monitor, 2018 Report.
- SACCOs Europe, (2016). Examining Challenges Leading to Low Integration of Savings and Credit Co-Operative Societies (SACCOs) in National Economies: Open Journal of Business and Management > 7 No.3, May 20 16
- PWC, (2016). Inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Headquartered in New York, NY): Global Annual Review; 104-2018-001. pwc.com/annualreview
- Bonfiglio, A. (2006), “Efficiency and productivity changes of the Italian agrifood cooperatives: A Malmquist index analysis”, Universita Politecnica Delle Marche, Piazzale Martelli Raffaele, Ancona, Italy.
- Briggeman, B.C., Jacobs, K.L., Kenkel, P., and Mckee, G. (2016), “Current trends in cooperative finance”, Agricultural Finance Review, 76(3), pp. 402-410.
- Mirie J. (2014). The Influence of members’ Income and Conduct of SACCOs in the Relationship between Characteristics and Efficiency of SACCOs in Kenya. Unpublished PhD thesis, Nairobi: University of Nairobi.
- SASRA, (2014). The Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority (SASRA). Supervision Report. Nairobi, Kenya.
- Kioko, C. (2014). Credit information sharing influence on performance of licensed deposit taking SACCO businesses in Kenya. Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 1(2).
- CGAP (Consultative Group to Assist the Poor) 2005. GAP Donor Brief No25: Working With Savings and Credit Cooperatives. August 2005. http://www.cgap.org/sites/default/files/CGAP-Donor-Brief-Working-With-Savings-Credit-Cooperatives-Aug-2005.pdf. Accessed 14/04/2015
- SASRA, (2016/2017). Competitive Strategies for Dynamic Business Environments; AJPO Journals USA LLC, 6 Mar 2023 – Business & Economics
- Bayai, I., & Ikhide, S. (2016). Financing and financial sustainability of microfinance institutions (MFIs): a conceptual view. Banks and Bank Systems, 11(2), 21-32.
- Lydia, C. (2018). Effect of asset performance management on profitability of deposit taking saccos in nakuru county (doctoral dissertation, JKUAT).
- Kamau, D., & Ayuo, A. (2016). The effects of working capital management on organizational performance-a survey of manufacturing firms in eldoret municipality. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(5), 72-80.
- Anania, Gikuri, A., & Hall, J. N. (2019): Factors Affecting SACCOs Capacity to Meet Members expectations.
- Mmari, G. A., & Thinyane, L. C.(2019). Analysis of factors influencing financial performance of savings and credit co-operative societies in Lesotho: Evidence from Maseru District. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(2), 121-136.
- McLnnes, N.S.(2000):Effect of working capital management on financial performance of businesses.
- Kasim, H., Mutula .Z. and Antwi. S.K (2015) Cash management Practices and financial performance of Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in the Northern region of Ghana. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management.III, Issue 7, July 2015
- M &Aminatu. S.M (2018). Operating Cash Flow and Corporate Financial Performance of Listed Conglomerate Companies in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) Vol 23, Issue 2, Ver.II 2018 pp 01-11. www.iosrjournals.org
- Ndirangu, L.W. (2017). Effects of Cash Management on the Financial Performance of the Companies Listed At the Nairobi Securities Exchange. Nairobi: Nairobi University
- Akinyomi,J. (2014). Effect of cash management on firm profitability of Nigerian manufacturing International Journal of Marketing and Technology. 4. 129-140.
- Gyebi,F., & Quain,S (2013) Internal Control on Cash collection. A case of the electricity company of Ghana Ltd. Accra East region, International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4 (9), pp. 217-233
- Uwonda, G., Okello, , & Okello .N.(2013) Cash Flow Management utilization by Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs) in Northern Uganda. Merit Research Journal of Accounting, Auditing, Economics and Finance,1(5) 67-80
- Majumdar, S. K., & Chhibber, P. (1999). Capital Structure and Performance: Evidence from a Transition Economy on an Aspect of Corporate Governance. Public Choice,98, 287-305. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018355127454
- Mahakud, J., & Misra, A.K. (2009). Effect of Leverage and Adjustment Costs on Corporate Performance: Evidence from Indian Companies. Journal of Management Research, 9(1), 35-42.
- Sana, T., Heman, D. L. & Sara, A. K. (2015). Debt financing on corporate performance, Pakistan.
- Pandey, L. M. (2010). Financial Management (10th edition), New Delhi :Vikas publishing house
- Brealey, R.A. and Meyers, S.C. (2003) Principles of Corporate Finance. International Edition, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Kofi Amponsah-Kwatiah & Michael Asiamah, (2020). “Working capital management and profitability of listed manufacturing firms in Ghana,” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 70(7), pages 1751-1771, August.
- Ngugi, K., Koori, M. & Wamugo, L. (2019). Working Capital Management and Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Kenya. International Journal of Business Management and Finance, 3(2), 325-336.
- Yator, P. K. (2018). The Working Capital Management Practices and Financial Performance of Middle-Level Colleges in Eldoret Town, Kenya.
- Riri, J. (2019). Effects of Working Capital Management on Financial Performance of Hotels in Nyeri County, Kenya (Unpublished Project). Nairobi.
- Kombo, K.N, (2017): Challenges facing commercial banks in implementation of capital adequacy
- Tanveer, B., Nazir, I., Khan, A. & Sadaf, R. (2016). The Impact of Working Capital Management on Firms’ Financial Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(3), 1097-1105.
- Kombo, K.D. and Tromp, L.A.D. (2006) Proposal and Thesis Writing: An Introduction. Paulines Publishers, Nairobi, Kenya.
CITE AS: Natukunda Neema, Andrew Nyakundi, Tom Mulegi, Manyange Michael and David Nyambane (2023). Effect of Working Capital Management on Financial Performance of Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies in Sheema Municipality, Uganda. IDOSR JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 8(2): 74-84. https://doi.org/10.59298/IDOSRJHSS/2023/12.1.5700